| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| *** mr_pouit_ is now known as mr_pouit | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| <bddebian> Boo | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| <gnomefreak> Seveas: just checking all the pinging. looks like bot is down | |
| <crimsun_> he says he has switched mail servers | |
| <gnomefreak> ah ok | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| *** mr_pouit_ is now known as mr_pouit | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| *** xeruno is now known as Beruno | |
| *** Beruno is now known as Leruno | |
| <owh> I've been working with sistpoty on fixing a number of dosfstools bugs. sistpoty has now attached a patch to one of the bugs, and another patch to another of the bugs. I own one bug, he owns another. He's gone off to bed and this is the first bug I'm fixing for Ubuntu. How do I tell the system that there is a fix? Do I just set the status to "Fix Committed", or do I need to do some steps first? | |
| <owh> He's already marked his bug as fixed and the upload was completed before he went to sleep. I'm just doing my bit :-) | |
| <Hobbsee> !info dosfstools feisty | |
| <ubotu> dosfstools: Utilities to create and check MS-DOS FAT filesystems. In component main, is standard. Version 2.11-2.1ubuntu1 (feisty), package size 50 kB, installed size 144 kB | |
| <Hobbsee> owh: what's the bug # of yours? | |
| <owh> Bug #68153 | |
| <Ubugtu> Malone bug 68153 in dosfstools "fsck.vfat hangs after renaming to FSCK9999.REN" [Undecided,Confirmed] http://launchpad.net/bugs/68153 | |
| <owh> His is Bug #62831 | |
| <Ubugtu> Malone bug 62831 in dosfstools "fsck.vfat truncates files of 4294967295 bytes length to 0 bytes at boot-time" [High,Fix committed] http://launchpad.net/bugs/62831 | |
| <owh> We were working on it together, he uploaded his fix and I pointed out another problem. | |
| <owh> So, I'm just trying to figure out how that is supposed to work. | |
| <Hobbsee> owh: ubuntu-main-sponsors is subscribed to the bug, so they should upload it for you. however, feel free to ask sistpoty to upload it when he wakes up again | |
| <Hobbsee> nice :) | |
| <owh> Do I need to change the status, or will ubuntu-main-sponsors take care of that? | |
| <owh> I can set it to In Progress | |
| *** Leruno is now known as Xoise__ | |
| <Hobbsee> they'll do it | |
| <owh> Should I set it to "In Progress" to show that we're working on it? | |
| <Hobbsee> you dont need to - the main sponsoring people tend to do that, once one of them is | |
| <owh> Cool, so my work here is done :-) | |
| <owh> Thanks Hobbsee for your time. | |
| *** Xoise__ is now known as Xeruno | |
| <Hobbsee> not a problem :) | |
| <Hobbsee> yeah, should be | |
| * owh goes off to hunt for more bugs. | |
| <owh> <grin> | |
| * Admiral_Chicago waves to owh | |
| <owh> Hiya, thanks for your initial introduction Admiral_Chicago, much appreciated. How did you go with your paper? | |
| <Admiral_Chicago> owh: it went well, almost done with finals | |
| <Admiral_Chicago> rocked it on my calc final too | |
| <owh> All good then. Next you'll need to shave ;-) | |
| * owh pokes a little fun in Admiral_Chicago's way. | |
| * owh is skipping happy because another bug bites the dust - actually we fixed three bugs out of five :-) | |
| * owh is aiming for 100%. | |
| <Admiral_Chicago> owh: teed any help with any tricky bugs | |
| <owh> Not at the moment. I'm about to pack up my satellite dish and get ready to move to another town 600km up the road, then I'll come back on-line and do some more work :-) | |
| <owh> http://itmaze.com.au/locations/ | |
| <Admiral_Chicago> good | |
| <Hobbsee> owh: nice. keep fixing :) | |
| * owh intends to :-) | |
| * owh waves bye to all... | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| * Hobbsee pokes Seveas | |
| * ajmitch pokes Hobbsee | |
| * Hobbsee drops a large cannonball on ajmitch | |
| <bddebian> heh | |
| <Jucato> weeeee :) | |
| * ajmitch wonders why he suddenly got a massive spam flood | |
| <Hobbsee> ajmitch: email, or irc? | |
| <ajmitch> email | |
| <ajmitch> it looks like my isp just sent me mail that's been queued for up to 2 weeks | |
| <ajmitch> since it appears to all be to one email address | |
| <Hobbsee> ouch | |
| <ajmitch> yeah | |
| <ajmitch> 400+ spam messages into my inbox | |
| <Admiral_Chicago> maybe one of you wants to try this bug, it's really a feature request | |
| <Admiral_Chicago> if you have a user who isn't in the "admin" group | |
| <Admiral_Chicago> and you hit sudo anything, nothing happens, however there is no output | |
| <Admiral_Chicago> however, i think the user shold have SOME output, "hey you don't have admin rights" etc | |
| <nixternal> doesn't it say that you have insufficient rights? | |
| <Admiral_Chicago> no | |
| <Admiral_Chicago> nothing | |
| <nixternal> does it ask for a password? | |
| <nixternal> and after you enter it, what happens? | |
| <Admiral_Chicago> err, i don't think so | |
| <nixternal> umm..sounds like a booged sudoers | |
| <Admiral_Chicago> I did "sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg" and I got no output | |
| <nixternal> no editing was done to the sudoers file was it? | |
| <Admiral_Chicago> no | |
| <Admiral_Chicago> although i put the insult flag to my sudo file... | |
| <ajmitch> usually it says that you've been naughty, the access will be logged (iirc) | |
| <nixternal> ya | |
| <ajmitch> /win 28 | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| <lifeless> Seveas: pke | |
| <lifeless> Seveas: Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveass | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| <DarkMageZ> lifeless, he's well aware of the issue :p | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| <dholbach> good morning | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| <Seveas> @unload Bugtracker | |
| <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas. | |
| <Seveas> argh | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: +o Seveas | |
| *** Seveas sets mode: +b %*!*@ubuntu/bot/ubugtu | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: -o Seveas | |
| *** shawarma_ is now known as shawarma | |
| *** dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | |
| <bddebian> Boo | |
| <ogra> bee | |
| <bddebian> :-) | |
| *** bddebian2 is now known as bddebian | |
| *** trappist_ is now known as trappist | |
| *** bddebian3 is now known as bddebian | |
| <Yawner> Ubugtu broken again? | |
| <palski> seems so | |
| <sfllaw> Hmm. | |
| <sfllaw> Just upgraded Feisty again and it seems to have broken Nautilus's default application choices. | |
| <sfllaw> Now it says things like: | |
| <sfllaw> Could not open location 'file:///home/sfllaw/Photos' | |
| <Yawner> nice | |
| <sfllaw> There is no default action associated with this function. | |
| <Admiral_Chicago> sfllaw: i think i saw a bug report about someting like that | |
| <sfllaw> I've been searching for a while. | |
| <sfllaw> It's obviously a Nautilus bug. | |
| <sfllaw> seb128 uploaded a new version yesterday. | |
| <sfllaw> bug 76482 | |
| <seb128> sfllaw: that bug is weird | |
| <sfllaw> seb128: Well, I can reproduce it right here. | |
| <seb128> sfllaw: folders are not handled the same way as datas, they should not break | |
| <sfllaw> seb128: Can I get you any information off my machine? | |
| <seb128> sfllaw: I can with some openoffice.org file, not with a directory though | |
| <seb128> sfllaw: yeah, a sec | |
| <seb128> sfllaw: what mimetype do you have to the folder properties? | |
| <sfllaw> sfllaw@jamaica:/etc/gnome$ gnomevfs-info $HOME | |
| <sfllaw> Name : sfllaw | |
| <sfllaw> Type : Directory | |
| <sfllaw> MIME type : x-directory/normal | |
| <sfllaw> Size : 4096 | |
| <sfllaw> Blocks : 8 | |
| <sfllaw> I/O block size : 4096 | |
| <sfllaw> Local : YES | |
| <sfllaw> SUID : NO | |
| <sfllaw> SGID : NO | |
| <sfllaw> Sticky : NO | |
| <sfllaw> Permissions : 1600755 | |
| <sfllaw> Link count : 79 | |
| <sfllaw> UID : 1000 | |
| <sfllaw> GID : 1000 | |
| <sfllaw> Access time : Tue Dec 19 14:34:18 2006 | |
| <sfllaw> Modification time : Tue Dec 19 14:15:40 2006 | |
| <sfllaw> Change time : Tue Dec 19 14:15:40 2006 | |
| <sfllaw> Device # : 2049 | |
| <sfllaw> Inode # : 9732098 | |
| <sfllaw> Readable : YES | |
| <sfllaw> Writable : YES | |
| <sfllaw> Executable : YES | |
| <seb128> hum | |
| <sfllaw> For what it's worth, `nautilus $HOME` works. | |
| <seb128> ok, so I can get the same here | |
| <seb128> I misread what you were saying | |
| <sfllaw> Ha ha! I'm not insane! | |
| <seb128> I though nautilus was broken on folders for you | |
| <sfllaw> Should this be filed under libgnome2-0? | |
| <sfllaw> That hasn't been changed in a while, though. | |
| <seb128> ah ah | |
| <seb128> iz glib bog | |
| <sfllaw> OK. | |
| <seb128> I'm on it | |
| <sfllaw> Ah. | |
| <sfllaw> I'll change the bug package. | |
| <seb128> sfllaw: don't bother, I'll close it soon and update that :) | |
| <sfllaw> Eep. Too late! | |
| <seb128> np, that's fine too ;) | |
| <sfllaw> seb128: Thanks for the fast response! | |
| <seb128> np | |
| <seb128> sfllaw: BTW could you approve #73115? | |
| <seb128> that's a trivial one line | |
| <seb128> and upstream keep pinging me about it | |
| <sfllaw> I was just about to, actually. | |
| <sfllaw> When I dist-upgraded. | |
| <sfllaw> :) | |
| <seb128> good ;) | |
| <sfllaw> Gah! Now VMware is broken. | |
| <sfllaw> Running feisty is painful. | |
| <sfllaw> :) | |
| *** giskard_ is now known as giskard | |
| *** mr_pouit_ is now known as mr_pouit | |
| *** mr_pouit_ is now known as mr_pouit | |
| <Adri2000> sfllaw: bug 76490 importance should be medium or high? | |
| <Adri2000> https://bugs.launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/egnome/+bug/76490 | |
| <Adri2000> hmm, would be medium since the package is installed and should work, but the docs are not built | |
| <sfllaw> Adri2000: That's a medium bug. | |
| <sfllaw> It's not installable, which is bad. | |
| <sfllaw> But it's also not a main package. | |
| <Adri2000> ok :) | |
| <coNP> Is bug #75659 a bug or a support request, what do you think? |